You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Significance of microalgal–bacterial interactions for aquaculture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Aquaculture, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/raq.12024 |
| Authors |
Fatin M. I. Natrah, Peter Bossier, Patrick Sorgeloos, Fatimah Md. Yusoff, Tom Defoirdt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 422 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 409 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 91 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 61 | 14% |
| Researcher | 47 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 59 | 14% |
| Unknown | 96 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 156 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 44 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 38 | 9% |
| Engineering | 16 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 7% |
| Unknown | 123 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2014.
All research outputs
#16,686,424
of 24,542,484 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Aquaculture
#393
of 452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,314
of 197,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Aquaculture
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,542,484 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.