↓ Skip to main content

Synonymization of key pest species within the Bactrocera dorsalis species complex (Diptera: Tephritidae): taxonomic changes based on a review of 20 years of integrative morphological, molecular…

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Entomology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 1,066)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
187 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Synonymization of key pest species within the Bactrocera dorsalis species complex (Diptera: Tephritidae): taxonomic changes based on a review of 20 years of integrative morphological, molecular, cytogenetic, behavioural and chemoecological data
Published in
Systematic Entomology, October 2014
DOI 10.1111/syen.12113
Authors

MARK K. SCHUTZE, NIDCHAYA AKETARAWONG, WEERAWAN AMORNSAK, KAREN F. ARMSTRONG, ANTONIS A. AUGUSTINOS, NORMAN BARR, WANG BO, KOSTAS BOURTZIS, LAURA M. BOYKIN, CARLOS CÁCERES, STEPHEN L. CAMERON, TONI A. CHAPMAN, SUKSOM CHINVINIJKUL, ANASTASIJA CHOMIČ, MARC DE MEYER, ELLENA DROSOPOULOU, ANNA ENGLEZOU, SUNDAY EKESI, ANGELIKI GARIOU‐PAPALEXIOU, SCOTT M. GEIB, DEBORAH HAILSTONES, MOHAMMED HASANUZZAMAN, DAVID HAYMER, ALVIN K. W. HEE, JORGE HENDRICHS, ANDREW JESSUP, QINGE JI, FATHIYA M. KHAMIS, MATTHEW N. KROSCH, LUC LEBLANC, KHALID MAHMOOD, ANNA R. MALACRIDA, PINELOPI MAVRAGANI‐TSIPIDOU, MAULID MWATAWALA, RITSUO NISHIDA, HAJIME ONO, JESUS REYES, DANIEL RUBINOFF, MICHAEL SAN JOSE, TODD E. SHELLY, SUNYANEE SRIKACHAR, KENG H. TAN, SUJINDA THANAPHUM, IHSAN HAQ, SHANMUGAM VIJAYSEGARAN, SUK L. WEE, FARZANA YESMIN, ANTIGONE ZACHAROPOULOU, ANTHONY R. CLARKE

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Benin 1 <1%
Unknown 178 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 22%
Student > Master 27 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 6%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 40 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 107 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 5%
Environmental Science 9 5%
Unspecified 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 43 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2023.
All research outputs
#549,412
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Entomology
#13
of 1,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,717
of 277,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Entomology
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.