You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cervical Aortic Arch with Hypoplastic Left Common Carotid Artery and Subaortic Left Brachiocephalic Vein.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1148/ryct.2021210195 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mohd Taufiq Yahaya, Suzana Ab Hamid |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 42% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Hungary | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 29% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,384,388
of 25,907,102 outputs
Outputs from Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging
#100
of 405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,335
of 441,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,907,102 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.