You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An Algorithm for Evaluation of Lightning Electromagnetic Fields at Different Distances with respect to Lightning Channel
|
---|---|
Published in |
Mathematical Problems in Engineering, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1155/2014/925463 |
Authors |
Mahdi Izadi, Mohd Zainal Abidin Ab Kadir, Maryam Hajikhani |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 22% |
Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
Lecturer | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 8 | 44% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Design | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,656,056
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Mathematical Problems in Engineering
#130
of 1,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,256
of 307,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mathematical Problems in Engineering
#14
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,140 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.