↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of the UGT1A1*6 (c.211G>A) Polymorphism and Prediction of Irinotecan Toxicity in Iranian Populations of Different Ethnicities

Overview of attention for article published in Chemotherapy, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence of the UGT1A1*6 (c.211G>A) Polymorphism and Prediction of Irinotecan Toxicity in Iranian Populations of Different Ethnicities
Published in
Chemotherapy, May 2015
DOI 10.1159/000376568
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reyhaneh Shakibi, Behnam Kamalidehghan, Fatemeh Ahmadipour, Goh Yong Meng, Massoud Houshmand

Abstract

Pharmacogenetic studies on irinotecan treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer have indicated that genetic polymorphisms in UGT1A1*6 can lead to decreased enzyme activity and accumulation of the toxic metabolite SN-38. Here, we compared the prevalence of UGT1A1*6 in an Iranian population of different ethnicities with those of other populations. A total of 300 healthy people of different ethnic groups including Persian, Azari, Lure, Kurdish, Arab, Baluch and Caspian in the Iranian population were enrolled. Genotyping of the UGT1A1*6 alleles (G/G, A/G, A/A) was performed by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism and direct genomic DNA sequencing. The most predictive genotype among the Iranian ethnic groups, especially Persian, was the G/G genotype (wild-type genotype). The frequency of the A/G genotype among the Persian, Azari, Lure, Kurdish, Arab, Baluch and Caspian ethnicities were 15.69% (n = 27), 11.11% (n = 8), 5.88% (n = 1), 9.09% (n = 1), 10% (n = 1), 20% (n = 1) and 0% (n = 0), respectively. Only one person with Persian ethnicity was homozygous for the mutation in UGT1A1*6 (0.58%). Additionally, the frequency of the A and G alleles in Iranians was 6.83 and 93.16%, respectively. The identification of the UGT1A1*6 alleles is necessary among the different Iranian ethnic groups before irinotecan therapy, suggesting that genotyping would be helpful for clinicians to optimize chemotherapy or identify individuals at risk of adverse drug reactions before clinical trials. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 29%
Other 2 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Lecturer 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 36%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 7%
Chemistry 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2015.
All research outputs
#17,756,606
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Chemotherapy
#441
of 572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,365
of 263,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemotherapy
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 572 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.