You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Meta-Analysis of Dengue Severity during Infection by Different Dengue Virus Serotypes in Primary and Secondary Infections
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0154760 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kuan-Meng Soo, Bahariah Khalid, Siew-Mooi Ching, Hui-Yee Chee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 485 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 481 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 68 | 14% |
| Researcher | 55 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 53 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 5% |
| Other | 71 | 15% |
| Unknown | 173 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 104 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 45 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 41 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 58 | 12% |
| Unknown | 181 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,176,687
of 25,830,005 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#26,336
of 225,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,741
of 349,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#577
of 4,663 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,830,005 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,663 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.