You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Level of dengue preventive practices and associated factors in a Malaysian residential area during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0267899 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dina Nurfarahin Mashudi, Norliza Ahmad, Salmiah Mohd Said |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 82 | 65% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 81 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,710,912
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#34,245
of 199,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,659
of 442,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#823
of 4,720 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,720 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.