↓ Skip to main content

Fused multivariate empirical mode decomposition (MEMD) and inverse solution method for EEG source localization

Overview of attention for article published in Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fused multivariate empirical mode decomposition (MEMD) and inverse solution method for EEG source localization
Published in
Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik, July 2017
DOI 10.1515/bmt-2017-0011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pegah Khosropanah, Abdul Rahman Ramli, Kheng Seang Lim, Mohammad Hamiruce Marhaban, Anvarjon Ahmedov

Abstract

EEG source localization is determining possible cortical sources of brain activities with scalp EEG. Generally, every step of the data processing sequence affects the accuracy of EEG source localization. In this paper, we introduce a fused multivariate empirical mode decomposing (MEMD) and inverse solution algorithm with an embedded unsupervised eye blink remover in order to localize the epileptogenic zone accurately. For this purpose, we constructed realistic forward models using MRI and boundary element method (BEM) for each patient to obtain results that are more realistic. We also developed an unsupervised algorithm utilizing a wavelet method to remove eye blink artifacts. Additionally, we applied MEMD, which is one of the recent and suitable feature extraction methods for non-linear, non-stationary, and multivariate signals such as EEG, to extract the signal of interest. We examined the localization results using the two most reliable linear distributed inverse methods in the literature: weighted minimum norm estimation (wMN) and standardized low resolution tomography (sLORETA). Results affirm the success of the proposed algorithm with the highest agreement compared to MRI reference by a specialist. Fusion of MEMD and sLORETA results in approximately zero localization error in terms of spatial difference with the validated MRI reference. High accuracy results of proposed algorithm using non-invasive and low-resolution EEG provide the potential of using this work for pre-surgical evaluation towards epileptogenic zone localization in clinics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Professor 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 9 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 14%
Computer Science 4 11%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 10 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2017.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik
#409
of 478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,484
of 326,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 478 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.