↓ Skip to main content

Effect of different cloning strategies in pET-28a on solubility and functionality of a staphylococcal phage endolysin

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechniques, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of different cloning strategies in pET-28a on solubility and functionality of a staphylococcal phage endolysin
Published in
Biotechniques, August 2020
DOI 10.2144/btn-2020-0034
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hong Y Tham, Adelene A-L Song, Khatijah Yusoff, Geok H Tan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Master 6 12%
Researcher 3 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 20 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 33%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Chemistry 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 24 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2020.
All research outputs
#19,957,118
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Biotechniques
#2,096
of 2,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#309,679
of 425,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechniques
#20
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.