↓ Skip to main content

Weighing the evidence of low glycemic index dietary intervention for the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: an Asian perspective

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Food Sciences & Nutrition, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Weighing the evidence of low glycemic index dietary intervention for the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: an Asian perspective
Published in
International Journal of Food Sciences & Nutrition, February 2014
DOI 10.3109/09637486.2013.845652
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barakatun-Nisak Mohd Yusof, Somayyeh Firouzi, Zalilah Mohd Shariff, Norlaila Mustafa, Nor Azlin Mohamed Ismail, Nor Azmi Kamaruddin

Abstract

This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of low glycemic index (GI) dietary intervention for the treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), specifically from the Asian perspective. A systematic review of the literature using multiple databases without time restriction was conducted. Three studies were retrieved based upon a priori inclusion criteria. While there was a trend towards improvement, no significant differences were observed in overall glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes in GDM women. However, a tendency for lower birth weight and birth centile if the intervention began earlier was noted. Low GI diets were well accepted and had identical macro-micronutrient compositions as the control diets. However, due to genetic, environment and especially food pattern discrepancies between Western countries and Asians, these results may not be contributed to Asian context. Clearly, there are limited studies focusing on the effect of low GI dietary intervention in women with GDM, particularly in Asia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 97 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 22%
Student > Bachelor 17 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 8%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Materials Science 2 2%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 20 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2016.
All research outputs
#5,338,695
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Food Sciences & Nutrition
#381
of 1,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,559
of 329,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Food Sciences & Nutrition
#9
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.