You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Muscle Status Response to Oral Nutritional Supplementation in Hemodialysis Patients With Protein Energy Wasting: A Multi-Center Randomized, Open Label-Controlled Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, December 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2021.743324 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sharmela Sahathevan, Tilakavati Karupaiah, Ban-Hock Khor, Birinder Kaur Sadu Singh, Zulfitri Azuan Mat Daud, Enrico Fiaccadori, Alice Sabatino, Karuthan Chinna, Abdul Halim Abdul Gafor, Sunita Bavanandan, Ravindran Visvanathan, Rosnawati Yahya, Zaimi Wahab, Bak-Leong Goh, Zaki Morad, Boon Cheak Bee, Hin Seng Wong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Peru | 1 | 25% |
Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 75% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 14% |
Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 13 | 59% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 13 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2021.
All research outputs
#13,192,459
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,643
of 4,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,590
of 499,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#165
of 480 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 499,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 480 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.