You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of Slaughter Knife Sharpness on Blood Biochemical and Electroencephalogram Changes in Cattle
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animals, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3390/ani10040579 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jurhamid Columbres Imlan, Ubedullah Kaka, Yong-Meng Goh, Zulkifli Idrus, Elmutaz Atta Awad, Ahmed Abubakar Abubakar, Tanbir Ahmad, Hassan N. Quaza Nizamuddin, Awis Qurni Sazili |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Syrian Arab Republic | 1 | 14% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 16 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 23% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 7 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 16 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,344,805
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Animals
#1,457
of 7,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,841
of 398,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animals
#62
of 300 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 300 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.