You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Phytochemical Analysis and Antimicrobial Activities of Methanolic Extracts of Leaf, Stem and Root from Different Varieties of Labisa pumila Benth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecules, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3390/molecules16064438 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ehsan Karimi, Hawa Z.E. Jaafar, Sahida Ahmad |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 2 | 1% |
| Algeria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 192 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 4% |
| Researcher | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 14% |
| Unknown | 46 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 9% |
| Engineering | 14 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 13 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 16% |
| Unknown | 56 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2016.
All research outputs
#4,706,122
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from Molecules
#2,310
of 19,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,280
of 112,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecules
#8
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,600 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.