↓ Skip to main content

Nanoparticles: Alternatives Against Drug-Resistant Pathogenic Microbes

Overview of attention for article published in Molecules, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
404 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
563 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nanoparticles: Alternatives Against Drug-Resistant Pathogenic Microbes
Published in
Molecules, June 2016
DOI 10.3390/molecules21070836
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gudepalya Renukaiah Rudramurthy, Mallappa Kumara Swamy, Uma Rani Sinniah, Ali Ghasemzadeh

Abstract

Antimicrobial substances may be synthetic, semisynthetic, or of natural origin (i.e., from plants and animals). Antimicrobials are considered "miracle drugs" and can determine if an infected patient/animal recovers or dies. However, the misuse of antimicrobials has led to the development of multi-drug-resistant bacteria, which is one of the greatest challenges for healthcare practitioners and is a significant global threat. The major concern with the development of antimicrobial resistance is the spread of resistant organisms. The replacement of conventional antimicrobials by new technology to counteract antimicrobial resistance is ongoing. Nanotechnology-driven innovations provide hope for patients and practitioners in overcoming the problem of drug resistance. Nanomaterials have tremendous potential in both the medical and veterinary fields. Several nanostructures comprising metallic particles have been developed to counteract microbial pathogens. The effectiveness of nanoparticles (NPs) depends on the interaction between the microorganism and the NPs. The development of effective nanomaterials requires in-depth knowledge of the physicochemical properties of NPs and the biological aspects of microorganisms. However, the risks associated with using NPs in healthcare need to be addressed. The present review highlights the antimicrobial effects of various nanomaterials and their potential advantages, drawbacks, or side effects. In addition, this comprehensive information may be useful in the discovery of broad-spectrum antimicrobial drugs for use against multi-drug-resistant microbial pathogens in the near future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 563 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 562 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 14%
Student > Master 68 12%
Student > Bachelor 61 11%
Researcher 52 9%
Student > Postgraduate 21 4%
Other 92 16%
Unknown 190 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 63 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 10%
Chemistry 46 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 32 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 5%
Other 117 21%
Unknown 218 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2016.
All research outputs
#12,961,619
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Molecules
#5,660
of 19,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,325
of 352,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecules
#80
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,740 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.