You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In Vivo Toxicity Evaluation of Sugar Adulterated Heterotrigona itama Honey Using Zebrafish Model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecules, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3390/molecules26206222 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rafieh Fakhlaei, Jinap Selamat, Ahmad Faizal Abdull Razis, Rashidah Sukor, Syahida Ahmad, Arman Amani Babadi, Alfi Khatib |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2022.
All research outputs
#3,914,061
of 23,426,104 outputs
Outputs from Molecules
#1,777
of 20,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,164
of 435,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecules
#60
of 821 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,426,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 821 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.