You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Documentation of inherited knowledge on wild edible fungi from Malaysia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Blumea - Journal of Plant Taxonomy and Plant Geography, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.3767/000651909x475996 |
| Authors |
F. Abdullah, G. Rusea |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2011.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Blumea - Journal of Plant Taxonomy and Plant Geography
#66
of 201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,575
of 108,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blumea - Journal of Plant Taxonomy and Plant Geography
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.