↓ Skip to main content

Bortezomib attenuates HIF-1- but not HIF-2-mediated transcriptional activation

Overview of attention for article published in Oncology Letters, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bortezomib attenuates HIF-1- but not HIF-2-mediated transcriptional activation
Published in
Oncology Letters, July 2015
DOI 10.3892/ol.2015.3545
Pubmed ID
Authors

NORAINI ABD-AZIZ, ERIC J. STANBRIDGE, NORAZIZAH SHAFEE

Abstract

Bortezomib is the first proteasomal inhibitor (PI) to be used therapeutically for treating relapse cases of multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma. A proposed mechanism for its action is that it prevents the proteasomal degradation of proapoptotic proteins, leading to enhanced apoptosis. Although the α subunit of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1 is not degraded with bortezomib treatment, the heterodimeric HIF-1 fails to transactivate target genes. HIF-1 and HIF-2 are related hypoxia-inducible transcription factors that are important for the survival of hypoxic tumor cells. The majority of reports have focused on the effects of bortezomib on the transcriptional activities of HIF-1, but not HIF-2. The present study investigated the effects of bortezomib on HIF-2 activity in cancer cells with different levels of HIF-1α and HIF-2α subunits. HIF-α subunit levels were detected using specific antibodies, while HIF transcriptional activities were evaluated using immunodetection, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and luciferase reporter assay. Bortezomib treatment was found to suppress the transcription and expression of CA9, a HIF-1-specific target gene; however, it had minimal effects on EPO and GLUT-1, which are target genes of both HIF-1 and HIF-2. These data suggest that bortezomib attenuates the transcriptional activity only of HIF-1, and not HIF-2. This novel finding on the lack of an inhibitory effect of bortezomib on HIF-2 transcriptional activity has implications for the improvement of design and treatment modalities of bortezomib and other PI drugs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 25%
Student > Master 7 19%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Chemistry 2 6%
Materials Science 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 6 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2015.
All research outputs
#18,431,664
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from Oncology Letters
#1,515
of 3,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,310
of 263,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oncology Letters
#48
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,860 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.