↓ Skip to main content

Termite Digestomes as a Potential Source of Symbiotic Microbiota for Lignocelluloses Degradation: A Review

Overview of attention for article published in Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Termite Digestomes as a Potential Source of Symbiotic Microbiota for Lignocelluloses Degradation: A Review
Published in
Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, July 2014
DOI 10.3923/pjbs.2014.956.963
Pubmed ID
Authors

L.J. Wong, P.S. H`ng, S.Y. Wong, S.H. Lee, W.C. Lum, E.W. Chai, W.Z. Wong, K.L. Chin

Abstract

Termites thrive in great abundance in terrestrial ecosystems and the symbiotic gut microbiota play important roles in digestion of lignocelluloses and nitrogen metabolism. Termites are excellent models of biocatalysts as they inhabit dense microbes in their guts that produce digestive enzymes to decompose lignocelluloses and convert it to end products such as sugars, hydrogen, and acetate. Different of digestive system between lower and higher termites which lower termites dependent on their dual decomposing system, consisting of termite's own cellulases and gut's protists. Higher termites decompose cellulose using their own enzymes, because of the absence of symbiotic protists. Termite gut prokaryotes efficiently support lignocelluloses degradation. In this review, a brief overview of recent experimental works, development and commercialization is discussed. Significant progress has been made to isolate cellulolytic strains from termites and optimise the digestion efficiency of cellulose. Future perspective should emphasize the isolation of cellulolytic strains from termites, genetically modifying or immobilization of the microbes which produce the desired enzyme and thus benefits on the microbiology and biotechnology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 24%
Researcher 5 24%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 43%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 14%
Materials Science 2 10%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2015.
All research outputs
#19,944,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences
#387
of 638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,417
of 241,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 638 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.