You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review of interventions addressing limited health literacy to improve asthma self-management
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Global Health, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.7189/jogh.10.010428 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hani Salim, Siti Nurkamilla Ramdzan, Sazlina Shariff Ghazali, Ping Yein Lee, Ingrid Young, Kirstie McClatchey, Hilary Pinnock, on behalf of the NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Respiratory Health collaborations |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Librarian | 5 | 7% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 22% |
| Unknown | 31 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 20% |
| Unknown | 32 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2020.
All research outputs
#16,057,393
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Global Health
#607
of 1,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,821
of 433,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Global Health
#29
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.