↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Why Standardization Efforts Fail

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Electronic Publishing, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 332)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Why Standardization Efforts Fail
Published in
Journal of Electronic Publishing, August 2011
DOI 10.3998/3336451.0014.103
Authors

Carl F. Cargill

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 71 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 29%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 17 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 17%
Engineering 10 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 9%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 13 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,326,034
of 25,611,630 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Electronic Publishing
#36
of 332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,621
of 131,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Electronic Publishing
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,611,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them