| Title |
Aligning Open Access Publication with Research and Teaching Missions of the Public University: The Case of The Lethbridge Journal Incubator (If 'if's and 'and's were pots and pans)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Electronic Publishing, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3998/3336451.0018.309 |
| Authors |
Daniel O'Donnell, Heather Hobma, Sandra Cowan, Gillian Ayers, Jessica Bay, Marinus Swanepoel, Wendy Merkley, Kelaine Devine, Emma Dering, Inge Genee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 25% |
| Qatar | 1 | 8% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 8 | 36% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
| Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 10 | 45% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 23% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,186,204
of 25,079,131 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Electronic Publishing
#26
of 332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,208
of 269,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Electronic Publishing
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,079,131 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.