Title |
Bedside detection of awareness in the vegetative state: a cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Lancet, November 2011
|
DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61224-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Damian Cruse, Srivas Chennu, Camille Chatelle, Tristan A Bekinschtein, Davinia Fernández-Espejo, John D Pickard, Steven Laureys, Adrian M Owen |
Abstract |
Patients diagnosed as vegetative have periods of wakefulness, but seem to be unaware of themselves or their environment. Although functional MRI (fMRI) studies have shown that some of these patients are consciously aware, issues of expense and accessibility preclude the use of fMRI assessment in most of these individuals. We aimed to assess bedside detection of awareness with an electroencephalography (EEG) technique in patients in the vegetative state. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 2% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 2% |
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Argentina | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 90 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 89 | 89% |
Scientists | 5 | 5% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 674 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 8 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 6 | <1% |
France | 5 | <1% |
Germany | 4 | <1% |
United States | 4 | <1% |
Japan | 3 | <1% |
Spain | 3 | <1% |
Poland | 2 | <1% |
Russia | 2 | <1% |
Other | 12 | 2% |
Unknown | 625 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 127 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 105 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 84 | 12% |
Student > Master | 81 | 12% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 42 | 6% |
Other | 149 | 22% |
Unknown | 86 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 134 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 128 | 19% |
Neuroscience | 102 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 9% |
Engineering | 36 | 5% |
Other | 82 | 12% |
Unknown | 134 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 268. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2023.
All research outputs
#137,370
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#1,801
of 42,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#454
of 156,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#7
of 404 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 404 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.