| Title |
Assessment of Valvular Calcification and Inflammation by Positron Emission Tomography in Patients With Aortic Stenosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1161/circulationaha.111.051052 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marc Richard Dweck, Charlotte Jones, Nikhil V. Joshi, Alison M. Fletcher, Hamish Richardson, Audrey White, Mark Marsden, Renzo Pessotto, John C. Clark, William A. Wallace, Donald M. Salter, Graham McKillop, Edwin J.R. van Beek, Nicholas A. Boon, James H.F. Rudd, David E. Newby |
| Abstract |
The pathophysiology of aortic stenosis is incompletely understood, and the relative contributions of valvular calcification and inflammation to disease progression are unknown. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 17% |
| Mexico | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 155 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 20% |
| Researcher | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 10% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 23% |
| Unknown | 25 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 91 | 56% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
| Engineering | 7 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 30 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2021.
All research outputs
#3,080,905
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#6,000
of 21,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,202
of 141,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#50
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.