↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of early Homo: An integrated biological perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Science, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
30 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
121 X users
facebook
14 Facebook pages
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
383 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
862 Mendeley
citeulike
10 CiteULike
Title
Evolution of early Homo: An integrated biological perspective
Published in
Science, July 2014
DOI 10.1126/science.1236828
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan C Antón, Richard Potts, Leslie C Aiello

Abstract

Integration of evidence over the past decade has revised understandings about the major adaptations underlying the origin and early evolution of the genus Homo. Many features associated with Homo sapiens, including our large linear bodies, elongated hind limbs, large energy-expensive brains, reduced sexual dimorphism, increased carnivory, and unique life history traits, were once thought to have evolved near the origin of the genus in response to heightened aridity and open habitats in Africa. However, recent analyses of fossil, archaeological, and environmental data indicate that such traits did not arise as a single package. Instead, some arose substantially earlier and some later than previously thought. From ~2.5 to 1.5 million years ago, three lineages of early Homo evolved in a context of habitat instability and fragmentation on seasonal, intergenerational, and evolutionary time scales. These contexts gave a selective advantage to traits, such as dietary flexibility and larger body size, that facilitated survival in shifting environments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 121 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 862 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 1%
France 5 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Mexico 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Finland 2 <1%
Other 12 1%
Unknown 815 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 192 22%
Researcher 138 16%
Student > Bachelor 121 14%
Student > Master 88 10%
Professor 58 7%
Other 161 19%
Unknown 104 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 271 31%
Social Sciences 113 13%
Arts and Humanities 83 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 44 5%
Psychology 43 5%
Other 159 18%
Unknown 149 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 366. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#87,964
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from Science
#2,995
of 83,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#654
of 242,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#31
of 909 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 909 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.