↓ Skip to main content

Policy, politics and public health.

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Public Health, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
132 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Policy, politics and public health.
Published in
European Journal of Public Health, October 2017
DOI 10.1093/eurpub/ckx152
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott L Greer, Marleen Bekker, Evelyne de Leeuw, Matthias Wismar, Jan-Kees Helderman, Sofia Ribeiro, David Stuckler

Abstract

If public health is the field that diagnoses and strives to cure social ills, then understanding political causes and cures for health problems should be an intrinsic part of the field. In this article, we argue that there is no support for the simple and common, implicit model of politics in which scientific evidence plus political will produces healthy policies. Efforts to improve the translation of evidence into policy such as knowledge transfer work only under certain circumstances. These circumstances are frequently political, and to be understood through systematic inquiry into basic features of the political economy such as institutions, partisanship and the organization of labour markets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 132 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 235 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 21%
Researcher 25 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Student > Postgraduate 12 5%
Other 34 14%
Unknown 72 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 44 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 43 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 3%
Arts and Humanities 6 3%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 75 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2023.
All research outputs
#466,643
of 25,480,126 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Public Health
#56
of 3,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,912
of 333,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Public Health
#4
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,480,126 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.