↓ Skip to main content

Locomotor Rehabilitation of Individuals With Chronic Stroke: Difference Between Responders and Nonresponders

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, December 2012
Altmetric Badge
8

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Locomotor Rehabilitation of Individuals With Chronic Stroke: Difference Between Responders and Nonresponders
Published in
Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, December 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.11.032
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark G. Bowden, Andrea L. Behrman, Richard R. Neptune, Chris M. Gregory, Steven A. Kautz

Abstract

To identify the clinical measures associated with improved walking speed after locomotor rehabilitation in individuals poststroke and how those who respond with clinically meaningful changes in walking speed differ from those with smaller speed increases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 239 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 16%
Student > Master 37 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 10%
Professor 21 9%
Other 46 19%
Unknown 45 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 18%
Engineering 43 18%
Neuroscience 32 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 10%
Sports and Recreations 12 5%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 63 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,788,678
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#1,452
of 6,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,551
of 286,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#29
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.