| Title |
Nutritional content of supermarket ready meals and recipes by television chefs in the United Kingdom: cross sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.e7607 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon Howard, Jean Adams, Martin White |
| Abstract |
To compare the energy and macronutrient content of main meals created by television chefs with ready meals sold by supermarkets, and to compare both with nutritional guidelines published by the World Health Organization and UK Food Standards Agency. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 108 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 38 | 35% |
| Ireland | 6 | 6% |
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Malta | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 47 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 72 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 16% |
| Scientists | 16 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 188 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 10% |
| Researcher | 17 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 14% |
| Unknown | 37 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 45 | 23% |
| Unknown | 39 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 148. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#284,431
of 25,844,183 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#3,599
of 65,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,795
of 278,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#23
of 841 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,844,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 841 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.