| Title |
The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.h391 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
K Hemming, T P Haines, P J Chilton, A J Girling, R J Lilford |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 136 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 38 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 20 | 15% |
| Australia | 7 | 5% |
| Canada | 7 | 5% |
| Ireland | 4 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 1% |
| Singapore | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 44 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 66 | 49% |
| Scientists | 52 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | <1% |
| United States | 8 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Cameroon | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Sudan | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1308 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 264 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 189 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 165 | 12% |
| Other | 76 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 73 | 5% |
| Other | 286 | 21% |
| Unknown | 283 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 431 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 118 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 103 | 8% |
| Psychology | 65 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 2% |
| Other | 198 | 15% |
| Unknown | 389 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 182. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#224,273
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#2,969
of 65,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,551
of 362,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#39
of 940 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 940 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.