↓ Skip to main content

Cell Press

Life Extension Factor Klotho Enhances Cognition

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Reports, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
236 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
356 Mendeley
Title
Life Extension Factor Klotho Enhances Cognition
Published in
Cell Reports, May 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.03.076
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dena B. Dubal, Jennifer S. Yokoyama, Lei Zhu, Lauren Broestl, Kurtresha Worden, Dan Wang, Virginia E. Sturm, Daniel Kim, Eric Klein, Gui-Qiu Yu, Kaitlyn Ho, Kirsten E. Eilertson, Lei Yu, Makoto Kuro-o, Philip L. De Jager, Giovanni Coppola, Gary W. Small, David A. Bennett, Joel H. Kramer, Carmela R. Abraham, Bruce L. Miller, Lennart Mucke

Abstract

Aging is the primary risk factor for cognitive decline, an emerging health threat to aging societies worldwide. Whether anti-aging factors such as klotho can counteract cognitive decline is unknown. We show that a lifespan-extending variant of the human KLOTHO gene, KL-VS, is associated with enhanced cognition in heterozygous carriers. Because this allele increased klotho levels in serum, we analyzed transgenic mice with systemic overexpression of klotho. They performed better than controls in multiple tests of learning and memory. Elevating klotho in mice also enhanced long-term potentiation, a form of synaptic plasticity, and enriched synaptic GluN2B, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) subunit with key functions in learning and memory. Blockade of GluN2B abolished klotho-mediated effects. Surprisingly, klotho effects were evident also in young mice and did not correlate with age in humans, suggesting independence from the aging process. Augmenting klotho or its effects may enhance cognition and counteract cognitive deficits at different life stages.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 356 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
United Kingdom 4 1%
France 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 336 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 66 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 16%
Student > Master 37 10%
Student > Bachelor 33 9%
Other 25 7%
Other 70 20%
Unknown 68 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 104 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 12%
Neuroscience 42 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 11%
Psychology 18 5%
Other 32 9%
Unknown 77 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 501. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#52,657
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Cell Reports
#60
of 13,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#337
of 242,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Reports
#1
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.