↓ Skip to main content

Cell Press

Long-Term Health of Dopaminergic Neuron Transplants in Parkinson's Disease Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Reports, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
25 X users
patent
1 patent
weibo
5 weibo users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
Title
Long-Term Health of Dopaminergic Neuron Transplants in Parkinson's Disease Patients
Published in
Cell Reports, June 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.05.027
Pubmed ID
Authors

Penelope J. Hallett, Oliver Cooper, Damaso Sadi, Harold Robertson, Ivar Mendez, Ole Isacson

Abstract

To determine the long-term health and function of transplanted dopamine neurons in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, the expression of dopamine transporters (DATs) and mitochondrial morphology were examined in human fetal midbrain cellular transplants. DAT was robustly expressed in transplanted dopamine neuron terminals in the reinnervated host putamen and caudate for at least 14 years after transplantation. The transplanted dopamine neurons showed a healthy and nonatrophied morphology at all time points. Labeling of the mitochondrial outer membrane protein Tom20 and α-synuclein showed a typical cellular pathology in the patients' own substantia nigra, which was not observed in transplanted dopamine neurons. These results show that the vast majority of transplanted neurons remain healthy for the long term in PD patients, consistent with clinical findings that fetal dopamine neuron transplants maintain function for up to 15-18 years in patients. These findings are critically important for the rational development of stem-cell-based dopamine neuronal replacement therapies for PD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 204 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 22%
Researcher 42 19%
Student > Master 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 26 12%
Other 11 5%
Other 38 17%
Unknown 26 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 29%
Neuroscience 48 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 11%
Engineering 10 5%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 23 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 216. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2018.
All research outputs
#181,112
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Cell Reports
#232
of 13,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,408
of 243,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Reports
#5
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.