↓ Skip to main content

Cell Press

The Role of the Endocrine System in Feeding-Induced Tissue-Specific Circadian Entrainment

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Reports, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
Title
The Role of the Endocrine System in Feeding-Induced Tissue-Specific Circadian Entrainment
Published in
Cell Reports, July 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.06.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miho Sato, Mariko Murakami, Koichi Node, Ritsuko Matsumura, Makoto Akashi

Abstract

The circadian clock is entrained to environmental cycles by external cue-mediated phase adjustment. Although the light input pathway has been well defined, the mechanism of feeding-induced phase resetting remains unclear. The tissue-specific sensitivity of peripheral entrainment to feeding suggests the involvement of multiple pathways, including humoral and neuronal signals. Previous in vitro studies with cultured cells indicate that endocrine factors may function as entrainment cues for peripheral clocks. However, blood-borne factors that are well characterized in actual feeding-induced resetting have yet to be identified. Here, we report that insulin may be involved in feeding-induced tissue-type-dependent entrainment in vivo. In ex vivo culture experiments, insulin-induced phase shift in peripheral clocks was dependent on tissue type, which was consistent with tissue-specific insulin sensitivity, and peripheral entrainment in insulin-sensitive tissues involved PI3K- and MAPK-mediated signaling pathways. These results suggest that insulin may be an immediate early factor in feeding-mediated tissue-specific entrainment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
France 2 2%
Brazil 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 91 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 18%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 26 26%
Unknown 11 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 15%
Neuroscience 9 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 14 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 251. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2023.
All research outputs
#146,888
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cell Reports
#183
of 12,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,139
of 240,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Reports
#1
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.