↓ Skip to main content

Cell Press

Collapse of Amphibian Communities Due to an Introduced Ranavirus

Overview of attention for article published in Current Biology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
29 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
34 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
Title
Collapse of Amphibian Communities Due to an Introduced Ranavirus
Published in
Current Biology, October 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.028
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen J. Price, Trenton W.J. Garner, Richard A. Nichols, François Balloux, César Ayres, Amparo Mora-Cabello de Alba, Jaime Bosch

Abstract

The emergence of infectious diseases with a broad host range can have a dramatic impact on entire communities and has become one of the main threats to biodiversity. Here, we report the simultaneous exploitation of entire communities of potential hosts with associated severe declines following invasion by a novel viral pathogen. We found two phylogenetically related, highly virulent viruses (genus Ranavirus, family Iridoviridae) causing mass mortality in multiple, diverse amphibian hosts in northern Spain, as well as a third, relatively avirulent virus. We document host declines in multiple species at multiple sites in the region. Our work reveals a group of pathogens that seem to have preexisting capacity to infect and evade immunity in multiple diverse and novel hosts, and that are exerting massive impacts on host communities. This report provides an exceptional record of host population trends being tracked in real time following emergence of a wildlife disease and a striking example of a novel, generalist pathogen repeatedly crossing the species barrier with catastrophic consequences at the level of host communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Mexico 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 254 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 18%
Student > Bachelor 37 14%
Researcher 31 12%
Other 15 6%
Other 40 15%
Unknown 41 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 118 45%
Environmental Science 35 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 21 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 2%
Other 14 5%
Unknown 47 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 267. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2023.
All research outputs
#135,068
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#737
of 14,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,171
of 268,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#13
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.