| Title |
A Proteome-Scale Map of the Human Interactome Network
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.050 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Rolland, Murat Taşan, Benoit Charloteaux, Samuel J. Pevzner, Quan Zhong, Nidhi Sahni, Song Yi, Irma Lemmens, Celia Fontanillo, Roberto Mosca, Atanas Kamburov, Susan D. Ghiassian, Xinping Yang, Lila Ghamsari, Dawit Balcha, Bridget E. Begg, Pascal Braun, Marc Brehme, Martin P. Broly, Anne-Ruxandra Carvunis, Dan Convery-Zupan, Roser Corominas, Jasmin Coulombe-Huntington, Elizabeth Dann, Matija Dreze, Amélie Dricot, Changyu Fan, Eric Franzosa, Fana Gebreab, Bryan J. Gutierrez, Madeleine F. Hardy, Mike Jin, Shuli Kang, Ruth Kiros, Guan Ning Lin, Katja Luck, Andrew MacWilliams, Jörg Menche, Ryan R. Murray, Alexandre Palagi, Matthew M. Poulin, Xavier Rambout, John Rasla, Patrick Reichert, Viviana Romero, Elien Ruyssinck, Julie M. Sahalie, Annemarie Scholz, Akash A. Shah, Amitabh Sharma, Yun Shen, Kerstin Spirohn, Stanley Tam, Alexander O. Tejeda, Shelly A. Trigg, Jean-Claude Twizere, Kerwin Vega, Jennifer Walsh, Michael E. Cusick, Yu Xia, Albert-László Barabási, Lilia M. Iakoucheva, Patrick Aloy, Javier De Las Rivas, Jan Tavernier, Michael A. Calderwood, David E. Hill, Tong Hao, Frederick P. Roth, Marc Vidal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 29% |
| France | 6 | 7% |
| Spain | 5 | 6% |
| Canada | 5 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
| India | 3 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 28 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 52% |
| Scientists | 33 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,782 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 18 | 1% |
| Spain | 8 | <1% |
| Canada | 8 | <1% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| Belgium | 4 | <1% |
| Israel | 3 | <1% |
| Sweden | 3 | <1% |
| India | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 30 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1679 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 452 | 25% |
| Researcher | 413 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 176 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 130 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 76 | 4% |
| Other | 315 | 18% |
| Unknown | 220 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 559 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 510 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 91 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 88 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 50 | 3% |
| Other | 212 | 12% |
| Unknown | 272 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 129. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#327,831
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#1,780
of 17,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,237
of 277,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#20
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.