↓ Skip to main content

Cell Press

Leptin Mediates the Increase in Blood Pressure Associated with Obesity

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
286 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
344 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Leptin Mediates the Increase in Blood Pressure Associated with Obesity
Published in
Cell, December 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.058
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie E. Simonds, Jack T. Pryor, Eric Ravussin, Frank L. Greenway, Ralph Dileone, Andrew M. Allen, Jaspreet Bassi, Joel K. Elmquist, Julia M. Keogh, Elana Henning, Martin G. Myers, Julio Licinio, Russell D. Brown, Pablo J. Enriori, Stephen O’Rahilly, Scott M. Sternson, Kevin L. Grove, David C. Spanswick, I. Sadaf Farooqi, Michael A. Cowley

Abstract

Obesity is associated with increased blood pressure (BP), which in turn increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases. We found that the increase in leptin levels seen in diet-induced obesity (DIO) drives an increase in BP in rodents, an effect that was not seen in animals deficient in leptin or leptin receptors (LepR). Furthermore, humans with loss-of-function mutations in leptin and the LepR have low BP despite severe obesity. Leptin's effects on BP are mediated by neuronal circuits in the dorsomedial hypothalamus (DMH), as blocking leptin with a specific antibody, antagonist, or inhibition of the activity of LepR-expressing neurons in the DMH caused a rapid reduction of BP in DIO mice, independent of changes in weight. Re-expression of LepRs in the DMH of DIO LepR-deficient mice caused an increase in BP. These studies demonstrate that leptin couples changes in weight to changes in BP in mammalian species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 109 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 344 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 331 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 69 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 17%
Student > Bachelor 34 10%
Student > Master 32 9%
Other 18 5%
Other 70 20%
Unknown 62 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 61 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 15%
Neuroscience 25 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 2%
Other 35 10%
Unknown 77 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 227. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2018.
All research outputs
#168,530
of 25,459,177 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#945
of 17,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,716
of 369,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#15
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,459,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.