| Title |
Integration Trumps Selection in Object Recognition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Biology, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.068 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Toni P. Saarela, Michael S. Landy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 30% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 21% |
| Unknown | 6 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 19 | 36% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2015.
All research outputs
#633,229
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#2,222
of 14,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,667
of 281,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#45
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.