↓ Skip to main content

Immunotherapy for recurrent miscarriage

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
18 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immunotherapy for recurrent miscarriage
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000112.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luchin F Wong, T Flint Porter, James R Scott

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 210 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 26 12%
Researcher 19 9%
Other 16 8%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 56 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 4%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 58 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,454,597
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,131
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,266
of 273,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.