You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2011
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000125.pub4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gerd Flodgren, Elena Parmelli, Gaby Doumit, Melina Gattellari, Mary Ann O'Brien, Jeremy Grimshaw, Martin P Eccles |
Abstract |
Clinical practice is not always evidence-based and, therefore, may not optimise patient outcomes. Opinion leaders disseminating and implementing 'best evidence' is one method that holds promise as a strategy to bridge evidence-practice gaps. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Singapore | 1 | <1% |
Egypt | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 313 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 76 | 23% |
Researcher | 55 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 8% |
Other | 23 | 7% |
Other | 65 | 20% |
Unknown | 36 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 101 | 31% |
Social Sciences | 42 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 10% |
Psychology | 29 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 12 | 4% |
Other | 54 | 17% |
Unknown | 57 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2018.
All research outputs
#2,048,128
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,317
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,444
of 131,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.