You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Maternal dietary antigen avoidance during pregnancy or lactation, or both, for preventing or treating atopic disease in the child
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000133.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kramer MS, Kakuma R, Kramer, Michael S, Kakuma, Ritsuko, Michael S Kramer, Ritsuko Kakuma |
Abstract |
Some breastfed infants with atopic eczema benefit from elimination of cow milk, egg, or other antigens from their mother's diet. Maternal dietary antigens are also known to cross the placenta. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Argentina | 1 | 20% |
Netherlands | 1 | 20% |
Chile | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Ireland | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 38 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 9 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 18% |
Student > Master | 6 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
Researcher | 3 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 6 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 48% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 10% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
Engineering | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2012.
All research outputs
#13,294,883
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,043
of 12,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,461
of 65,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#61
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.