↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for treating cholestasis in pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for treating cholestasis in pregnancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000493.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vinita Gurung, Michael Stokes, Philippa Middleton, Stephen J Milan, William Hague, Jim G Thornton

Abstract

Obstetric cholestasis has been linked to adverse maternal and fetal/neonatal outcomes. As the pathophysiology is poorly understood, therapies have been empiric. The first version of this review, published in 2001, and including nine randomised controlled trials involving 227 women, concluded that there was insufficient evidence to recommend any of the interventions alone or in combination. This is the first update.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 265 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 16%
Student > Bachelor 37 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 12%
Researcher 31 11%
Other 23 9%
Other 51 19%
Unknown 54 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 130 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 9%
Psychology 17 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 60 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,000,390
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,715
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,888
of 209,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#131
of 297 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 297 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.