You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Enteral nutritional therapy for induction of remission in Crohn's disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000542.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mary Zachos, Melody Tondeur, Anne Marie Griffiths |
Abstract |
The role of enteral nutrition in Crohn's disease is controversial. Increasing research on the mechanisms by which nutritional therapy improves the clinical well being of patients with Crohn's disease has led to novel formula design and trials comparing two different forms of enteral nutrition. This meta-analysis aims to provide an update on the existing effectiveness data for both corticosteroids versus enteral nutrition and for one form of enteral nutrition versus another for inducing remission of active Crohn's disease. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
United States | 3 | 1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 241 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 39 | 16% |
Researcher | 38 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 31 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 10% |
Other | 21 | 8% |
Other | 57 | 23% |
Unknown | 40 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 108 | 43% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 9% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
Other | 27 | 11% |
Unknown | 47 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2018.
All research outputs
#5,189,339
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,107
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,172
of 173,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.