You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effects of on‐screen, point of care computer reminders on processes and outcomes of care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001096.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kaveh G Shojania, Alison Jennings, Craig R Ramsay, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Janice L Kwan, Lisha Lo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 491 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 462 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 85 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 76 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 69 | 14% |
| Other | 36 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 6% |
| Other | 106 | 22% |
| Unknown | 88 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 176 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 9% |
| Psychology | 37 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 36 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 16 | 3% |
| Other | 71 | 14% |
| Unknown | 109 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,266,434
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,660
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,600
of 121,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.