You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001141.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Renfrew, Mary J, McCormick, Felicia M, Wade, Angela, Quinn, Beverley, Dowswell, Therese |
| Abstract |
There is extensive evidence of important health risks for infants and mothers related to not breastfeeding. In 2003, the World Health Organization recommended infants be exclusively breastfed until six months of age, with breastfeeding continuing as an important part of the infant's diet till at least two years of age. However, breastfeeding rates in many countries currently do not reflect this recommendation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 15% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 493 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 473 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 87 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 11% |
| Researcher | 52 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 50 | 10% |
| Other | 111 | 23% |
| Unknown | 78 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 182 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 92 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 50 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 6% |
| Psychology | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 6% |
| Unknown | 90 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2022.
All research outputs
#816,978
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,615
of 13,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,037
of 168,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.