↓ Skip to main content

Antimicrobials for treating symptomatic non‐typhoidal Salmonella infection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
336 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antimicrobials for treating symptomatic non‐typhoidal <i>Salmonella</i> infection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001167.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ifeanyi A Onwuezobe, Philip O Oshun, Chibuzo C Odigwe

Abstract

Non-typhoidal Salmonella (NTS) commonly causes diarrhoea, and is usually self-limiting, although sometimes people become ill with sepsis and dehydration. Routine antibiotic use for this infection could result in persistent colonization and the spread of resistant bacterial strains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 330 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 11%
Student > Bachelor 36 11%
Researcher 33 10%
Other 20 6%
Other 55 16%
Unknown 107 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 3%
Other 40 12%
Unknown 124 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,222,944
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,571
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,239
of 192,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.