↓ Skip to main content

Voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) for changing HIV‐related risk behavior in developing countries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
179 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
368 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) for changing HIV‐related risk behavior in developing countries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001224.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Virginia A Fonner, Julie Denison, Caitlin E Kennedy, Kevin O'Reilly, Michael Sweat

Abstract

Voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) continues to play a critical role in HIV prevention, care and treatment. In recent years, different modalities of VCT have been implemented, including clinic-, mobile- and home-based testing and counseling. This review assesses the effects of all VCT types on HIV-related risk behaviors in low- and middle-income countries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 368 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Zimbabwe 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 359 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 81 22%
Researcher 50 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 11%
Student > Bachelor 33 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 6%
Other 61 17%
Unknown 81 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 13%
Social Sciences 42 11%
Psychology 23 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 14 4%
Other 38 10%
Unknown 94 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,840,139
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,488
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,429
of 187,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#98
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.