You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diuretics for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001454.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Audra Stewart, Luc P Brion, Roger Soll |
| Abstract |
Lung edema may complicate respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
| Researcher | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 35 | 25% |
| Unknown | 37 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 4% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 44 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2012.
All research outputs
#3,094,302
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,733
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,614
of 247,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.