↓ Skip to main content

Acellular vaccines for preventing whooping cough in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acellular vaccines for preventing whooping cough in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2000
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001478
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tinnion, O N, Hanlon, M

Abstract

Routine use of whole cell pertussis vaccines was suspended in some countries in the late 1970s and early 1980s, leading to a resurgence of whooping cough. Acellular pertussis vaccines containing purified or recombinant Bordetella pertussis antigens were developed in the hope that they would be as effective but less toxic than the whole cell vaccines. The objective of this review was to assess the effects of acellular pertussis vaccines in children.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 30%
Student > Master 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 30%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2012.
All research outputs
#20,178,031
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,984
of 12,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,450
of 107,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.