You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patient education for preventing diabetic foot ulceration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001488.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Johannes AN Dorresteijn, Didi MW Kriegsman, Willem JJ Assendelft, Gerlof D Valk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Peru | 1 | 6% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 453 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 452 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 70 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 57 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 37 | 8% |
| Researcher | 30 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 7% |
| Other | 89 | 20% |
| Unknown | 140 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 148 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 88 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 3% |
| Psychology | 10 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 35 | 8% |
| Unknown | 150 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2018.
All research outputs
#1,638,157
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,477
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,279
of 362,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#81
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.