↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for pathological gambling

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for pathological gambling
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2000
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001521.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Oakley‐Browne, Peter Adams, Peta Mobberley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 2%
Italy 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 81 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 20 23%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 26%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 18 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,440,254
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,883
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,431
of 113,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.