↓ Skip to main content

Nutritional support for head‐injured patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nutritional support for head‐injured patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001530.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

P Perel, T Yanagawa, F Bunn, I Roberts, R Wentz, A Pierro

Abstract

Head injury increases the body's metabolic responses, and therefore nutritional demands. Provision of an adequate supply of nutrients is associated with improved outcome. The best route for administering nutrition (parenterally (TPN) or enterally (EN)), and the best timing of administration (for example, early versus late) of nutrients needs to be established.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 191 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 14%
Student > Master 23 12%
Other 22 11%
Researcher 21 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 8%
Other 49 25%
Unknown 40 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 19%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Psychology 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 49 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2014.
All research outputs
#17,348,916
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,493
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,346
of 84,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.