You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervix cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001774.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jayne Tierney, Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta‐analysis Collaboration Collaboration, Larysa Rydzewska |
| Abstract |
Despite the enrollment of more than 3000 women in randomised trials, the benefits and risks of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer remained uncertain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 114 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 38 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 40 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2013.
All research outputs
#20,824,878
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,261
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,596
of 62,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.